اخي الكريم عاشق توتي

هنا وصف الانحياز التحكيمي للارجنتين منذ بداية البطولة حتى أخرها ..! مع المصدر :

انظر الى الكم الهائل من الاخطاء التحكيمية

و كلها تنصب لمصلحة الفريق المضيف



In Argentina’s first match, two Hungarian players were sent off, but numerous bad Argentine fouls went unpunished

Argentina won 2-1. Against Michel Platini’s France, Argentina were outplayed but won again, thanks to a penalty for a non-existent French foul

and the denial of a French penalty for a clear foul on Didier Six.

The first and only time Argentina faced a strong-minded independent referee (the Israeli Abraham Klein) they lost 1-0 to Italy

In the second round, another dirty, badly refereed match, against Brazil, ended 0-0. Argentina then overcame Poland 2-0,

thanks in part to Kempes diving full length like a goalkeeper to palm away a certain Poland equaliser.

Thus the stage was set for Argentina’s crucial game against Peru, probably the most scandalous in the history of the World Cup.

The Argentine committee in charge of World Cup organisation was headed by the ruthless Carlos Lacoste,

protege of Admiral Emilio Eduardo Massera, the navy’s top man in the junta. Massera had set up the torture centre at ESMA and helped run it

in its early days. Lacoste’s committee had decided Brazil – Argentina’s rivals for a place in the final –

must play their last group match in the afternoon.

Argentina would play a few hours later with the huge advantage of knowing they had to beat Peru by at least four goals to reach the final






المصدر

FT.com / Life & Arts - A dangerous game


تحياتي لك